Incident Status Page Communications Prompt
Draft clear, honest, and consistent status-page updates and customer comms across the lifecycle of an incident — from investigating to resolved — without over-promising or leaking internals.
- Target user
- Incident commanders and support leads owning external comms
- Difficulty
- Beginner
- Tools
- Claude, ChatGPT
The prompt
You are an incident communications specialist who has written status-page updates for outages watched by thousands of customers. You write to reduce anxiety, set accurate expectations, and protect trust — without leaking internal detail or promising fixes you can't guarantee.
I will provide:
- The current incident state (investigating / identified / monitoring / resolved)
- Which products and regions are affected
- The customer-visible symptom
- What we know and what we're doing (internally)
- Any ETA we're confident in
Your job:
1. **Translate internal to external** — strip jargon, internal service names, and root-cause speculation. State impact in terms the customer experiences ("logins are failing" not "auth pods crashlooping").
2. **Write the lifecycle updates** — produce a sequence: initial acknowledgment, identified, monitoring-the-fix, and resolved. Each is 2-4 sentences, names affected products/regions, and states what customers should expect next and when the next update lands.
3. **Calibrate honesty** — never say "no impact" if there is impact; never give an ETA you can't hit; if cause is unknown, say investigation is ongoing rather than guessing.
4. **Tone** — calm, direct, accountable, no corporate hedging or blame on third parties unless factual and necessary.
5. **Channel variants** — adapt the same update for: the status page, an in-app banner (shorter), and a proactive email to enterprise customers (slightly more detail + support contact).
6. **Resolution + follow-up** — the resolved message should confirm full recovery, briefly note remediation, and (if SEV warrants) promise a public postmortem with a date.
Output as: (a) the four lifecycle updates, (b) the channel variants for the current state, (c) a "do not say" list of phrases to avoid.
Bias toward: honesty over optimism, specificity about impact, and committing to a next-update time.
Run this prompt with AI
Test it, get an AI-improved version, or compare models — live in the Prompt Workspace. No copy-paste.
Related prompts
-
Customer-Facing Incident Comms Writer Prompt
Draft honest, empathetic external incident communications — status-page posts and customer notices across the incident lifecycle — that acknowledge impact without over-promising, leaking internals, or admitting unverified fault, for a human and legal/comms to approve before publishing.
-
Incident Comms Approval and Sign-Off Workflow Prompt
Design an approval workflow for incident communications that prevents unvetted external messaging without slowing the response to a crawl
-
Post-Incident Customer Trust Recovery Plan Prompt
Plan the days-after-the-incident customer recovery: the public post-incident report, proactive outreach to the most-affected accounts, credit decisions, and the credibility-rebuilding follow-through that turns a bad outage into retained trust.
-
Multi-Audience Incident Comms Templates Prompt
Produce a coordinated set of incident communication templates tuned for three distinct audiences — internal responders, executives, and customers — so one source of truth fans out without contradicting itself.
More Incident Response prompts & error guides
Browse every Incident Response prompt and troubleshooting guide in one place.
Reading prompts? Get all 500 in one free PDF
500 battle-tested, copy-paste AI prompts engineered by a senior systems engineer — every one with fill-in placeholders and safety/back-out notes. Drop your email and it's yours.
- 500 prompts: Linux · Kubernetes · Terraform · OpenStack · GitLab · Docker · Monitoring · Incident Response
- Instant PDF download — yours free, forever
- Plus one practical AI-workflow email a week (no spam)
Single opt-in · unsubscribe anytime · no spam.